REVIEWS

THE IMITATION GAME (Morten Tyldum, 2014)

The_Imitation_Game_Descifrando_Enigma-824166913-largeIt’s difficult to make a good review of The imitation game without falling into the spoiler. I had a hard time writing this cos’ it’s not a biopic at use but Morten Tyldum film is based on a true story. The cryptographer‘s Alan Turing history.

The screenplay written by newcomer Graham Moore took the Oscar for Best Adapted Screenplay based on the book by Andrew Hodges: Alan Turing: The Enigma. First things first real history differs somewhat from the true story of Alan Turing, and what I mean. We are talking about is based on a biography. And I explain at the end of the critical defining the differences between the real and the fictional Turing. Now go for the film.

The film is set in three time levels that are interspersed with each other.
The first is the space of II World War, at the beginning (1939) in which a Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge University, Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch) an expert of puzzle solving, but no fucking German idea, is hired by the British Government to work in a team; whose secret project is to break the secret code behind the unbreakable Nazi machine communication, called Enigma, if they can give the Allies an advantage and possibly even end the war.

The problem is that Enigma is recoded every day, so even if the computer can decipher a coded message transmitted by the Nazis, the code will be obsolete tomorrow. There are 159 billion possible keywords that could be entered into Enigma.

Charles Dance (Commander Denninston) and Benedict Cumberbatch (Alan Turing)  © 2014 - The Weinstein Company
Charles Dance (Commander Denninston) and Benedict Cumberbatch (Alan Turing)
© 2014 – The Weinstein Company

A large-minded man arrogant, antisocial and solitary measure, Alan, is the bane of the existence of the team, especially that of his superior, Commander Denniston (Charles Dance aka Tywin Lannister) and Hugh Alexander (Matthew Goode), which is hired as initial team leader. While Hugh and the rest of teamwork to break the codes of everyday life, in the belief that the only way to learn the secret of Enigma, Alan works for itself in the development of a machine, a little artificial intelligence, which he believes is what is required to not only break a code every day, but it shall break any code immediately when introduced into Enigma.

Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch)  working on his machine   © 2013 - Black Bear Pictures
Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch) working on his machine
© 2013 – Black Bear Pictures

He has is to convince Alan Denniston to finance the machine to the tune of 100,000 pounds. So take the law into their own hand, he writes a letter to the very Churchill that puts him in control of the team.

The tone of the team changes dramatically with the inclusion of Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley), the only woman to access the entrance exam and the first to finish.

Sir Stewart Menzies (Mark Strong), Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch), Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley) - © 2014 - The Weinstein Company
Sir Stewart Menzies (Mark Strong), Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatch), Joan Clarke (Keira Knightley) – © 2014 – The Weinstein Company

Joan not only adds another brilliant mind to the team, but also provides Alan the keys to how to behave socially to achieve the objectives out in a team environment.

Matthew Beard, Benedict Cumberbatch and Allen Leech Matthew Beard (Peter Hilton), Benedict Cumberbatch (Alan Turing) and Allen Leech (John Cairncross) © 2014 - The Weinstein Company
Matthew Beard (Peter Hilton), Benedict Cumberbatch (Alan Turing) and Allen Leech (John Cairncross) © 2014 – The Weinstein Company

Joan’s participation in the project is threatened by the traditional values ​​of their parents, who see their place in the world as someone’s wife until the Turing himself at his house and «tricks» to their parents for she cans still working.

The second time plane is in 1928, when Alan is a young man (Alex Lawther) who attends a boarding school. Even then, he is seen as different and bullying intimidated and suffers because of it. His only real friend at school is Christopher Morcom (Jack Bannon), «Christopher», a name that will eventually lead his famous machine, mostly because Christopher Morcom was his true and «much-loved» friend.

Alex Lawther (Young Alan Turing)  © 2014 - The Weinstein Company
Alex Lawther (Young Alan Turing)
© 2014 – The Weinstein Company

The third is in 1951, after being informed that there has been Alan’s house in Manchester because his neighbor called the police. Since nothing was stolen, Alan is quick to avoid the police. But the principal investigator, Detective Robert Nock (Rory Kinnear) believes that Alan is hiding something dismiss them so quickly. What the police discovered the time has arrived to impact the lives of Alan, but not Nock want first to know what lies beneath the surface information.

Robert Knock (Rory Kinnear) and Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatc) in the interrogation  © 2014 - The Weinstein Compan
Robert Knock (Rory Kinnear) and Alan Turing (Benedict Cumberbatc) in the interrogation
© 2014 – The Weinstein Compan

So far the synopsis. So, here I come with review.

First, I’ve to say that Benedict Cumberbatch is amazing. It is totally off her usual character Shelock as point, not giving him the Oscar to Keaton, they could have given it and him, and that its interpretation is much better than Redmayne in The Theory of Everything. I said. It’s masterful, his bow transformation is impressive and transformed into this eccentric genius and rather freaky as if it cost nothing. Conveys his emotions very complex and reaches the viewer without much artifice. Authentic acting intensity filled with numerous shades. 10.

Matthew Beard (Peter Hilton), Matthew Goode (Hugh Alexander), Keira Knightley (Joan Clarke), Benedict Cumberbatch (Alan Turing) and Allen Leech (John Cairncross) - © 2014 - StudioCanal
Matthew Beard (Peter Hilton), Matthew Goode (Hugh Alexander), Keira Knightley (Joan Clarke), Benedict Cumberbatch (Alan Turing) and Allen Leech (John Cairncross) – © 2014 – StudioCanal

Replication is done by a very correct Keira Knighley. It has a very important role but she also takes advantage too as an actress. It is rather flat. To my left me a little dull in his role Loan. Very awkward and sexy insinuating his own intelligence but Keira is. I do not think it has cost him get into the role.

Loan Clarke (Keira Knightley) © 2014 - The Weinstein Company
Loan Clarke (Keira Knightley) © 2014 – The Weinstein Company

The story is dramatic and heartbreaking. It has hook and keeps you glued to the screen the 114 minutes that the Thriller. Personally, I think a complicated story to tell and I think (without having read the book) the script is fine but Cumberbach and what it brings, the film would collapse. The photo is average and the band sound more of the same. The realization is elegant but typical of a film of WWII.

The two main storylines Turing’s homosexuality and the Enigma case, which closed with a fixed screen little letters seems a little sad, a bad end to a very good film.

The character of Turing is an expert in freshwater for any director who wants to make a good story and it is a great unknown that far from being admired as a war hero, he was charged and tried for his homosexuality in 1952 sentenced to chemical castration and committed suicide two years after his conviction for indecent behaviour.

«The world needs you as you are»

Here I go with the real Turing and what differs in the film, if it is of interest to someone. Please note that there can be spoiler.

 The real Alan Turing.
The real Alan Turing.
  • Christopher Morcom and Turing did not share classroom, in fact Alan’s first love was much older than him.
    The «Turing machine» called Bombe not «Christopher»
  • Two years after the trial, in 1954, died from cyanide poisoning, apparently after eating a bitter apple that didn’t considered a suicide. Lack of evidences. ¿Murder? Who knows?
  • Turing was an excellent long-distance runner, a subject that the film seems nothing more than a hobby for give vent to.
  • The Polish contribution to the manufacture of the Bombe spends more than unnoticed.
  • Turing travelled to the United States in November 1942 and worked with US Navy cryptanalysts in Enigma and built Bombe in Washington.
  • Turing had an older brother, John. What the movie is not even mentioned.
  • The work of Turing-Good and contribution to «Christopher» is not mentioned, can be found here.
  • The actual operation of Enigma can be found here.
  • The Bombe had its predecessor, this.
  • In 1939, Alan Turing was not came from Cambridge, he came name as a Doctor in Princeton.

However, it is not a bad movie. It’s good, it becomes entertaining and Cumberbach is superb. The script is well suited, as far as it goes, according to my information and inquiries.

It seems to be the year of «Based on a true story», and by that I left The Sniper for criticizing all nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars. Soon you will have news. I hope I have not bored a lot.

Miss.

REVIEWS

BIG EYES (Tim Burton, 2014)

Big_Eyes-906876044-large

I was eager to see this movie, but I was taking a while, cos’ as I knew not what «burtonian» I expected. And I mean, I’m a staunch fan of Burton universe: its darkness, its fantastic narrative and convoluted photography. But Big Eyes is another thing. I was afraid to take dissatisfaction, but as always my beloved Timmy never disappoints me.

The story, based on true events, tells the story of Keane’s marriage and their problems for the authorship of the works of art with which they won so many thousands of dollars.

1958, Margaret Ulbrich (painter and housewife) leaves her husband in boring village in Northern California and moved to San Francisco, the big city, to pursue her dream of being an artist. Portfolio in hand, to the adventure of looking for work in a time when women had it complicated is released, but she has a daughter, Jane, who maintain. While painting portraits in the park, she meets Walter Keane they have a date. Everything rushes and they fall in love and marry soon.

Big_Eyes-377862486-large

She has a very peculiar style of painting where the eyes are noted for their large frame, outside perspective, portraits that dazzle everyone.

«The eyes are the window to the soul»

Walter is a mediocre painter who actually does not look more than the cute, and innocent Marge don’t realize she has a husband who takes advantage of her and her art since both signed as Keane. The name and the painting of the «artist» becomes a success and Walter, great seller and developer, opened his own gallery with works of his wife. And here I can tell or I would burn up you the movie.

Big_Eyes-553900340-large

Amy Adams, in his starring role is perfect. Suffer but contains as good woman of 60’s who observes the head of household. His obsession, his doubts and his madness are superb. Her transformation bow is terrific. I understand that she has received the Golden Globe, but… Comedy-musical? I haven’t laughed a bit.

Christoph Waltz, Mr. Keane, is repulsive, hateful and as the film progresses more and more you catch ringworm. Fucking impostor, tapped and sexist. Waltz is not my cup of tea, unless on Tarantino’s films, but he does not so bad in this film. Certainly not reach the height of his co-star Amy The Great, but he does pretty decent. Highlighting the scenes in which he is beside himself.

Among the cast does not stand out to anyone except Delaney Raye in his role as the little Jane. It’s really touching in its role smarty girl and somewhat repellent. Madeleine Arthur in the role of teenager Jane sees more safer because it’s obviously older, so I don’t seem to have much merit acting like little Delaney.

Photography is not typical of Burton except in the first scenes that remind me a bit like Edward Scissorhands scenarios and those colourful houses. Then the atmosphere changes dramatically. But I think the director is trying to turn around his career with this film, I know him very well I’ve read e-v-e-r-y-t-h-i-n-g about him. Planning as always at Californian director movies, it’s perfect.

tim_burton_Big_Eyes_Interview

The argument based on fact, seems correct. Nor delves much history but the surface features, but don’t think it takes much more to tell the story of Margaret Keane.

Margaret Keane

OST by Danny Elfman, is perfect. I don’t expected less of the usual Burton’s compositor.

In short, the film has not disappointed me even less. I expected worse in fact, due to criticism of which I usually reliable. But in truth, I was hooked history, especially the character of Margaret. In this case, the trailer has not deceived me 😉

Miss.

REVIEWS

FOXCATCHER (BENNETT MILLER, 2014)

Foxcatcher-382481514-large

After reading such good reviews on both sides of the pond I encourage to watch it, but I think it will be too «Americanism apology» for my taste. Here I go. 135 minutes ahead. Ugh! What little desire … I start from the idea that it is a psychological drama about wrestling, don’t call me much despite the factual usually I always draw attention.
The premise, briefly, is as follows: an Olympic medalist, Mark Schulz (Channing Tatum) accepts the offer to train in the sports facilities of rich, spoiled and extravagant heir John Du Pont (Steve Carrell) for the 1988 Seoul Olympics, he frustrated for not being an elite athlete is dedicated to the hunt for new talent coaching pure love of country. But … (there’s always a but) there hopes to concentrate on training and thus prevent his older brother Dave (Mark Ruffalo) the perfect fighter and person, hereinafter to the right as always.

Foxcatcher-521305121-large
The fact is that the younger brother, Mark (Tatum), finds the course of his life despite being entered age. A I do not think so. I also am entering age and am a «ni-ni»(Spanish expresion for “neither study nor work”), but this is not the case. I’m glad to Channig Tatum has retaliated for his role handsome guy movie and engaged once more serious roles. He has scenes that really impress. The boy from Alabama grows as an actor and I’m happy because he has a great potential and paper to paper, film to film is exceeded, saving the ungainly guff comedies that he mades occasionally.
Mark Ruffalo’s performance has seemed impressive although being nominated for a couple of sequences seems to have a little extra. The guy overboard perfect in his role as big brother, but as that is not.
In contrast, although Steve Carrel and his interpretation of Du Pont (in my previously very typecast for his role in «The Office») among its pathos and ambiguity me seem arrogant, the main link between Tatum and it grates me, not me credible or when they get along or when worn badly. Hard to recognize after a magnificent job of makeup.

Foxcatcher-463839070-large

Visually, the work is superb. The grey atmosphere helps provide darkness to the story. Planning is masterful, but expected no less of cinematographer Greig Fraser (Zero dark thrity, Killing Them Softly).
In short, even though the film is very good, I was surprised but I found that it was nearly not smokable, since the argument has been heavy and long me. Of course, with an actor direction sublime, but I expected more from Miller after having Capote (2005) as one of my biopic references.
True, I was expecting the typical American topic on sport and the desire to overcome the yankees and I found a dark story about the psychology of the characters, but still has not convinced me. The story is much dilates and becomes heavy, I think that counts for little in a film. I put a 6. I feel disappointed. Again, damn trailers.

Miss.